The word fascism is being thrown around a lot, but there is a real danger of ultra-nationalist militancy growing from current economic troubles and dissatisfaction, as the rise of The British National Party demonstrates.
I don’t want to paint a broad brush over such a large and non-centralized group as the angry right-wing mob. But dangerous sentiment is frequently seen there: the view that troops fight for freedom against a nebulous foreign threat to America while freedom is threatened at home by traitors with some kind of treasonous socialist agenda. Of course, any government is a threat to liberty at all times – that is their function. But the Tea Party right doesn’t have a consistent libertarian message – to them government is good when it pushes people around, but bad when it takes too much of their money to give people who don’t deserve it. They express the view that authority should protect them against bad things, and that those who hamper these efforts are traitors.
The sentiment of heroic warriors protecting the nation while domestic enemies stabbed in the back is classic fascist breeding ground.

Sure, there are times when fighters at the front are betrayed by people with authoritarian agendas (I think of Stalinist treachery in the Spanish Civil War) but “The Troops” are not protecting our freedom – they are expanding the influence of the American political class. Obama just has a different view of power than neo-cons do.
Ron Paul and the anti-war right have the potential to defuse the authoritarianism seen in the most visible opposition to Obama. The more right-wingers realize that empire is not the answer, the closer they get to a consistently libertarian view. It will hopefully become easier for them to think that politicians are not selling out Americans or betraying the troops, but are just doing what politicians always do: mislead the public and set themselves up as the key to a better future. If the troops are not fighting for freedom, then the whole government is the problem and promoting the soldier ethos seems like less of an answer. Campaign For Liberty, by pushing a consistent anti-empire message using traditional American imagery, could set the American right in a less authoritarian direction.
None of this means that anarchists should downplay pushing for anarchy, or should not condemn authoritarianism when it comes from any professed friends of liberty. But it may inform the way we interact with different political groups.
darianworden.com